Description

In Garo society, the inheritance of family property follows a unique pattern where females can become heirs, while males do not have the same entitlement. This exclusion of male members from inheritance can be attributed to several factors, including prevailing social values, the historical background of the Garo community, and cultural practices upheld by its people. These factors motivate the Garos to continue practicing their customary law, even though the decision-making power regarding the selection of female heirs and other inheritance matters remain predominantly with the male members. However, ideologically this arrangement is not perceived as exclusion, but rather as a division of responsibilities that has evolved over time. While women possess the right to inheritance, the ultimate decision-making authority rests with the male members. This practice also aligns with the legal framework of Bangladesh, which does not impose restrictions on this cultural norm. This research paper aims to delve into the rationales for excluding Garo males from inheriting family property by analyzing cultural norms and customary laws prevalent among the Garo people. By doing so, it seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the justification for this practice, contributing to the ongoing discourse on gender equality and social justice within the Garo community. The findings of this research will also shed light on gender roles relating to inheritance practice among the Garo people, fostering a deeper comprehension of these societal dynamics.

Keywords: Customary laws of Garos, Indigenous People of Bangladesh, Inheritance, Matrilineal Tribe, Law of Evidence.